The article is still unbalanced, but it is not incapable of improvement, so the tag is not appropriate. contribs) 18:28, 22 November 2007 (UTC) As the reviewing admin, I have removed the speedy tag.Please do not revert tags until discussion or clean up happens -Preceding unsigned comment added by Atheniandemocracy ( talk MezzoMezzo 19:27, 20 August 2007 (UTC) Blatant advertisement Also, just because one editor happens to like an article as is doesn't justify removing cleanup and/or dispute tags if the content is indeed disputed. Be very careful and please review the official Wikipedia:No personal attacks and Wikipedia:Civility policies. Msoamu 17:22, 20 August 2007 (UTC) I am not sure who "We" is, nor am I sure whom you are calling a "Wahhabi". MezzoMezzo 09:49, 18 August 2007 (UTC) No Objectivity I'm not sure if this is necessarily a copyright violation but in the near future we need to go through other official material from the group as the rest of the article reads like an advertisement and considering my suspicions were correct about the portions we can find in the above links, it's not a stretch to say that the rest of the article could be directly copy-pasted as well. This is one of them, and in addition I was actually correct about my passing remakr about advertising pamphlet here is an image of one. MezzoMezzo 09:39, 18 August 2007 (UTC) Actually I just checked some of the external links, and much of this article appears to be copied and pasted directly from some of the Da'wat-e-Islami official sites.
In the case of this article Wikipedia's Manual of Style is absolutely essential, as this article needs a tune-up badly whether the current version is acceptable or not. In addition - and this is my main concern - the article is a poorly formatted mess with little to no structure and is overly long. While I respect your opinion, I would highly recommend you review the official policy about using articles to advertise, as the article looks as though it was almost lifted directly out of a Da'wat-e-Islami advertising pamphlet. The rapid expansion of this relegious group is really amazing. Its Annual meeting (in year 2010)in Gujrat, Pakistan had the gathering is more than 1.2 million. I agree that it may seem as an advertisement but it has most comprehensive description and introduction of Dawateislami.Īccording to latest news (October, 2010) Dawateislami now has orgnizational structure in 72 countries around the world. I differ from the opinion what MezzoMezzo said, the article may not suite him, but i think that it is perfectly OK for an encyclopedia. Servantofallah786 -Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.37.252.74 ( talk) 00:07, 1st October, 2010(UTC) Once i have finished editing this article i hope everyones views will become positive, and i hope that all will learn something from it. not only have they spread knowledge and educated people they have also done great amounts of charity work in earthquake struck areas. I will hopefully edit this article over the next couple of weeks, and you will be able to see for yourselves the amount of work dawat e islami has done. from the research i have done i felt that dawat e islami is a very peaceful sufi movement. i have done alot of research over the last couple of months and found that dawat e islami wouldnt really need advertising as they have spread across 63 countries so far without wikipidea. MezzoMezzo 19:04, 20 June 2007 (UTC) Latest newsĪccording to latest news (October, 2010) Dawateislami now has orgnizational structure in 120 countries around the world. I'm going to tag it for now, for anyone else reading this, please see what you can do to fix it. Normally I would try to help myself but given the poor nature of this article, it's quite a daunting task and will most likely need to be a community effort. On top of that, it's overly long, contains dtails not necesarily relevant or appropriat to an encyclopedia, and is horribly formatted. Man, this article isn't anywhere close to objective. 26 Main Paragraph Source 3 - Primary Research Doctoral Thesis Misquoted replace with Mission Statement.24 Thomas K Gugler - Abstract Quoted Out of Context and Against NPOV of the research paper | primary sources cited.23 Ref 16 A Quote which does not align with content.